Feedback:
by akelly over 3 years ago.
It’s a cool web logo, but I would be intrested to see what it’d look like on the web.
by Quoin over 3 years ago.
Looks like a picture of a logo, not a logo itself. Maybe feels a little flimsy?
by MR over 3 years ago.
Ahh.. Quoin the print logo is also loaded. This was an experiment / stylized version
by Cwilk over 3 years ago.
It’s a difficult thing to combine flat art with 3D effects. I like it at first glance, but not so sure once I’ve stared for a while. The ‘SON’ seems to be a different font than the first part of the word which reads JEM to me. And I agree that the rocket needs a 3D effect.
by Iain over 3 years ago.
this would be great. if it were the title screen of a Pixar movie. otherwise, it’s over done. looks pretty, but borderline obsequious.
by onesummer over 3 years ago.
kinda just seems like alot of “fluff” to me. I agree with Cwilk, it reads “JEM” “SON”
by tizzle over 3 years ago.
bit too much for a logo. only works on black with very little else on the page.
by ade.j over 2 years ago.
Perfect logo for the type of company it represents, although you do need to delineate the ETTI letters, even if it’s just by a 3d effect. the rocket looks good in flat 3d as it is now (in my opinion anyway)
by kestrel over 2 years ago.
It’s quite nicely rendered, but I’m not sure how appropriate it is as a logo. It looks more like the title for the latest Die Hard film. I see the tie-in with the film industry, but I’m not convinced. That said, the logo isn’t meant to impress graphic designers.
Very GooD
by designer over 1 years ago.
It was the 1st one I saw on the page due to the dramatic contrast, but I think it would be very complaex to use in other various print media’s.
by jasonized over 8 months ago.
Looks nice, if it was in a site though. But a brand identity? I don’t think so.
Love it – although the rocket looks too flat – could do with some 3d effect/shape.